Personal development is sometimes presented as though meaningful change requires dramatic action: changing career, transforming relationships, adopting a completely new lifestyle or somehow becoming a different person.

In reality, much of the quality of our lives is shaped by considerably smaller things.

How we interpret an awkward conversation. How we respond when a plan goes wrong. The questions we ask ourselves when we feel stuck. The pictures we create in our minds about the future. The meaning we attach to setbacks. The goals we choose to pursue. The emotional states from which we communicate, decide and act.

This is one of the reasons Neuro-Linguistic Programming — more commonly known as NLP — has remained influential within coaching, communication and personal development.

At its most practical, NLP encourages us to become more aware of the relationship between our thinking, language, emotional states and behaviour, and then to experiment with changing those patterns when they are no longer producing useful results.

As O’Connor and Seymour describe in their introduction to NLP, the field is fundamentally concerned with patterns of communication, outcomes, internal experience and the development of greater behavioural choice (O’Connor & Seymour, 2011).

That idea of choice is important.

We cannot control everything that happens around us. We can, however, develop greater flexibility in how we interpret events, manage our internal responses, communicate with other people and decide what to do next.

And that is where NLP can become particularly useful in everyday life.

This article explores seven practical NLP tools and models:

1. Well-Formed Outcomes
2. Reframing
3. Anchoring and State Management
4. Submodalities and Mental Imagery
5. Perceptual Positions
6. The Meta Model
7. Logical Levels and Personal Alignment

None requires somebody to be a therapist, professional coach or NLP Practitioner to begin exploring the underlying principles.

Used thoughtfully, they can provide a practical framework for developing greater self-awareness, emotional flexibility, purposeful action and everyday wellbeing.

NLP, Happiness and Wellbeing

Before looking at the seven tools, it is worth clarifying what we mean by happiness.

Happiness is not the permanent absence of disappointment, uncertainty, frustration or sadness.

A psychologically healthy life includes a wide range of emotional experiences.

Wellbeing is better understood as having the psychological resources to:

• experience positive emotions;
• develop meaningful relationships;
• pursue worthwhile goals;
• recover from setbacks;
• maintain perspective;
• experience autonomy and competence;
• develop meaning and purpose;
• and respond flexibly to changing circumstances.

This is where the practical philosophy behind much NLP training becomes interesting.

Rather than asking:

“How do I make sure nothing difficult ever happens?”

NLP tends to encourage questions such as:

“What resources can I develop that will enable me to respond more effectively when it does?”

That represents a significant shift from attempting to control life to developing greater flexibility within life.

1. Well-Formed Outcomes

Turning vague wishes into meaningful direction

One of the most useful distinctions within NLP is the difference between thinking about a problem and thinking about an outcome.

People frequently know what they do not want.

“I don’t want to be stressed.”

“I don’t want to feel unfit.”

“I don’t want to hate my job.”

“I don’t want to keep arguing.”

“I don’t want to feel nervous.”

These statements may accurately describe dissatisfaction, but they do not provide the mind with particularly useful instructions about what should happen instead.

NLP therefore encourages people to describe what they do want.

Instead of:

“I don’t want to feel stressed.”

We might ask:

“How would you like to feel instead?”

Perhaps the answer becomes:

“I want to feel calm, organised and in control of my working day.”

Immediately, the thinking process changes.

The person can begin exploring what calmness, organisation and control would actually look like behaviourally.

This principle appears throughout NLP literature and is generally described through the concept of well-formed outcomes.

A practical outcome framework

When thinking about something you would like to change, ask:

What specifically do I want?

Describe the desired result rather than merely describing the current problem.

How will I know when I have achieved it?

What will you see, hear, feel or be doing differently?

Where, when and with whom do I want this?

Context matters.

Someone might want greater confidence when presenting at work without necessarily wanting to become highly assertive in every social interaction.

What resources do I already have?

Think about skills, experiences, relationships, knowledge and personal qualities.

What additional resources might I need?

Training? Support? Practice? Information? Time?

What could be the consequences of achieving this?

NLP often refers to this as an ecology check.

For example, someone might say:

“I want to double my income.”

That sounds attractive.

But if achieving it means working eighty hours every week and rarely seeing their family, the outcome may conflict with other important values.

What is the first step?

This turns aspiration into behaviour.

Why this matters

The psychological literature on goal-setting is extensive.

Locke and Latham’s influential review of more than three decades of goal-setting research concluded that appropriately constructed goals can affect performance through mechanisms including attention, effort, persistence and strategy development (Locke & Latham, 2002).

There is another important connection.

Peter Gollwitzer’s research on implementation intentions demonstrates the value of translating goals into specific behavioural plans.

Rather than simply deciding:

“I am going to exercise more.”

an implementation intention might be:

“On Monday, Wednesday and Friday, when I finish breakfast, I will walk for thirty minutes.”

A major meta-analysis by Gollwitzer and Sheeran involving 94 independent tests found a meaningful positive effect of implementation intentions on goal achievement.

The NLP lesson is straightforward:

Do not simply wish for a different life. Define what “different” means and identify what you can actually do.

Try this today

Take one current frustration and complete the sentence:

“Instead of __________, I would like __________.”

Then ask:

“What could I do within the next 24 hours that would move me slightly closer to that outcome?”

Small amounts of purposeful progress can have a surprisingly significant effect on wellbeing.

2. Reframing

Changing the meaning without denying reality

Two people can experience almost exactly the same event and respond completely differently.

One sees redundancy as catastrophe.

Another eventually sees it as an opportunity to reconsider their career.

One sees constructive criticism as personal rejection.

Another sees information that could improve performance.

One sees making a mistake as proof of incompetence.

Another sees feedback.

The event may be the same.

The frame around the event changes.

Within NLP, reframing involves exploring alternative meanings or contexts for an experience.

Robert Dilts has written extensively about language, beliefs and reframing within NLP, particularly through work concerned with how changing the frame surrounding an experience can alter its perceived meaning (Dilts, 1990; 1999).

Reframing is not pretending everything is wonderful

This is an important distinction.

If someone loses their job, a useful reframe is not:

“This is fantastic!”

It may not be fantastic at all.

A more grounded reframe might be:

“I would not have chosen this, but now that it has happened, what possibilities exist that I might not previously have considered?”

Reframing does not require denying reality.

It involves recognising that our first interpretation of reality is not necessarily the only possible interpretation.

Psychological parallels: cognitive reappraisal

There is a particularly strong connection here with research into cognitive reappraisal.

Emotion researcher James Gross defines reappraisal as changing how we interpret a situation in order to alter its emotional impact.

Research by Gross and John found that people who habitually used reappraisal tended to report greater positive emotion, less negative emotion, better interpersonal functioning and higher wellbeing than people who relied more heavily on emotional suppression (Gross & John, 2003).

More recent daily-life research also continues to associate reappraisal with more favourable subsequent emotional experience, while strategies such as rumination tend to be associated with poorer outcomes.

Five useful reframing questions

When something goes wrong, ask:

1. What else could this mean?

2. What can I learn from this?

3. What might become possible because this has happened?

4. How might I think about this situation six months from now?

5. What part of this situation can I influence?

These questions interrupt automatic interpretation.

And sometimes that is enough to open up a completely different behavioural response.

Everyday example

Imagine sending an important email and receiving no reply.

Your first interpretation might be:

“They’re ignoring me.”

That thought creates irritation or anxiety.

A reframe might generate other possibilities:

“Perhaps they are busy.”

“Perhaps they haven’t seen it.”

“Perhaps they need more information.”

“Perhaps I need to follow up.”

The emotional state changes because the meaning changes.

And when the emotional state changes, behaviour often changes with it.

3. Anchoring and State Management

Learning how to access more useful emotional states

Think about hearing a particular piece of music from your teenage years.

Within seconds, you may remember places, people and emotions you have not consciously thought about for years.

A smell can trigger childhood memories.

A photograph can change your mood.

Walking into a particular building can produce excitement, confidence, calmness or anxiety.

Human beings naturally form associations between experiences and internal states.

NLP describes an intentionally created association between a stimulus and an internal response as an anchor.

The concept has some parallels with broader psychological research into associative learning and conditioned responses, although claims about specific NLP anchoring procedures should not be confused with established findings from conditioning research. Research into classical conditioning has nevertheless demonstrated the importance of contextual cues, memory and learned associations in influencing later responses.

From an everyday personal development perspective, anchoring is perhaps best thought of as a state-management ritual.

Why emotional state matters

Consider how differently you communicate when you feel:

• confident rather than intimidated;
• curious rather than defensive;
• calm rather than angry;
• optimistic rather than defeated;
• focused rather than overwhelmed.

The external situation may remain unchanged.

But your ability to deal with it can change dramatically.

NLP therefore encourages us to ask:

“What state would help me deal with this situation more effectively?”

That question is very different from:

“How do I stop feeling nervous?”

The first question directs attention towards a resource.

Creating a simple resource anchor

Choose a state you would like greater access to — perhaps confidence.

Step 1: Remember a genuine experience

Think of a time when you really did feel confident.

It does not need to relate to your current challenge.

Step 2: Recreate the experience

Remember what you saw.

What could you hear?

How were you standing?

How were you breathing?

What did confidence feel like physically?

Step 3: Intensify the state

Allow yourself to become absorbed in the memory.

Step 4: Create a simple cue

This could be:

• pressing a finger and thumb together;
• a particular word;
• a deliberate breath;
• adjusting your posture;
• touching your wrist.

Step 5: Practise

Repeatedly rehearse the resourceful state together with the cue.

The aim is not to create a magical button that instantly eliminates difficult emotion.

Instead, it is to develop a familiar routine that helps direct attention towards a previously experienced resourceful pattern.

Everyday applications

You might use state-management rituals:

• immediately before a presentation;
• before an important telephone call;
• before entering a difficult conversation;
• when beginning focused work;
• before exercising;
• while preparing for an interview;
• or when you notice yourself becoming unnecessarily reactive.

A particularly simple version is:

STOP → BREATHE → REMEMBER → CHOOSE.

Stop the automatic response.

Take a deliberate breath.

Remember how you want to show up.

Choose the next behaviour.

The ability to regulate yourself before trying to influence a situation is one of the most valuable personal development skills anyone can learn.

4. Submodalities and Mental Imagery

Changing how we represent experiences internally

Imagine two memories.

The first is vivid, colourful, large and close.

The second seems distant, faded and difficult to see clearly.

Even without knowing what the memories contain, you may already notice that the first representation appears psychologically more immediate.

NLP uses the term Submodalities to describe qualities of sensory experience.

For visual imagery these might include:

• brightness;
• colour;
• distance;
• size;
• movement;
• focus.

Auditory experience might differ in:

• volume;
• tone;
• direction;
• tempo.

Internal bodily experience might vary in:

• location;
• temperature;
• pressure;
• movement;
• intensity.

NLP practitioners frequently experiment with these qualities to explore whether altering the representation changes somebody’s emotional response.

It is important to be precise here: research does not establish every specific NLP claim concerning Submodalities.

However, the broader proposition that mental imagery and its characteristics influence emotion is strongly supported within cognitive psychology.

Holmes and Mathews’ review of research into mental imagery concluded that imagery can evoke powerful emotional responses and can sometimes produce greater emotional effects than verbally thinking about the same material.

Research also demonstrates meaningful relationships between imagery vividness and emotional response.

Why this matters in everyday life

People do not only respond to what is physically happening now.

We continually respond to things happening inside our imagination.

A forthcoming presentation may not be happening for another week.

Yet somebody can imagine themselves forgetting every word, seeing an unimpressed audience and feeling embarrassed — and produce genuine anxiety today.

Another person might imagine themselves speaking clearly, dealing comfortably with questions and finishing confidently.

Both futures are imaginary.

But both can influence the emotional state experienced in the present.

A simple imagery experiment

Think briefly about something mildly annoying from the past.

Avoid traumatic or highly distressing material.

Notice the image that appears.

Now experiment.

Make the image slightly smaller.

Move it further away.

Reduce the brightness.

Imagine placing a frame around it.

Perhaps make it black and white.

Notice whether the emotional response changes.

Then experiment with something positive.

Remember a moment of achievement, connection, humour or happiness.

Make the image clearer.

Notice the sounds.

Recall your posture.

Bring your attention towards the pleasant aspects of the experience.

You are not rewriting history.

You are discovering something important:

the way an experience is represented internally can influence how strongly we respond to it now.

This becomes particularly useful when thinking about the future.

Instead of repeatedly rehearsing catastrophe, deliberately rehearse competence.

This is not a guarantee that everything will go perfectly.

It is mental preparation for responding effectively.

5. Perceptual Positions

Learning to see situations from more than one perspective

One of the fastest ways to become trapped in conflict is to assume that our own interpretation is the complete interpretation.

NLP’s Perceptual Positions model deliberately introduces different viewpoints.

A common version uses three positions.

First Position — Self

Experience the situation from your own point of view.

What do I think?

What do I feel?

What matters to me?

What do I need?

Second Position — Other

Imagine the situation from the other person’s perspective.

What might they be seeing?

What pressures might they be experiencing?

What might they think I am trying to do?

What is important to them?

Third Position — Observer

Imagine watching the interaction from outside.

What patterns become visible?

What is each person contributing?

What is not being communicated?

What advice might a neutral observer offer?

Why perspective matters

Perspective-taking has an established research literature beyond NLP.

A meta-analysis involving 4,678 participants found a significant positive association between perspective-taking and romantic relationship satisfaction.

Research on conflict has also found that feeling understood by another person can buffer some of the damaging effects conflict might otherwise have on relationship satisfaction.

There is also an interesting relationship between the NLP observer position and psychological research into self-distancing.

Kross and Ayduk’s work suggests that stepping back psychologically from a difficult emotional experience can sometimes promote more adaptive reflection and reduce the tendency to become caught in repetitive rumination.

An everyday Perceptual Positions exercise

Think about a disagreement.

Position One

Ask:

“What do I want them to understand about my position?”

Write down the answer.

Position Two

Now imagine becoming the other person.

Ask:

“What might I want them to understand about my position?”

Write that down.

Position Three

Imagine observing both people.

Ask:

“What does each person appear to need from this conversation?”

Then:

“What could either person do differently that would improve the interaction?”

This does not require agreeing with the other person.

Understanding is not agreement.

It simply increases the amount of information available before deciding what to do.

6. The Meta Model

Using better questions to challenge unhelpful thinking

Language does more than communicate our experience.

Language helps organise it.

Consider statements such as:

“Nobody respects me.”

“I always mess things up.”

“They made me angry.”

“I can’t change.”

“Everyone thinks I’m useless.”

“There’s no point.”

These statements may express genuine emotion.

But linguistically they contain assumptions.

Nobody?

Always?

Can’t?

How exactly did they cause the emotion?

How do you know what everyone thinks?

The NLP Meta Model, originally developed by Richard Bandler and John Grinder, provides patterns of questioning intended to recover information that has been deleted, distorted or generalised within language (Bandler & Grinder, 1975).

It is one of the most practically useful aspects of NLP because it can be applied not only when communicating with other people but also when listening to our own internal dialogue.

Three common thinking patterns

Generalisation

“I always get it wrong.”

Useful questions:

Always?

Can you think of one time when that wasn’t true?

Suddenly a permanent identity statement begins turning into a specific problem.

Deletion

“Nobody listens.”

Ask:

Who specifically?

Perhaps the answer becomes:

“My manager didn’t listen during yesterday’s meeting.”

That is much easier to address than:

“Nobody listens.”

Unspecified meaning

“This is impossible.”

Ask:

What specifically makes it impossible?

The answer might reveal:

“I don’t currently know how to do it.”

Those are completely different statements.

“Impossible” shuts down exploration.

“I don’t currently know how” invites learning.

The connection with Socratic questioning

There are interesting parallels between Meta Model questioning and Socratic questioning within cognitive behavioural approaches.

Both approaches challenge people to examine assumptions rather than simply accepting the first thought that occurs.

A 2023 research review concluded that although research specifically isolating Socratic questioning remains relatively limited, available evidence suggests that it may contribute to cognitive change within therapy.

A study involving people receiving cognitive behavioural therapy for depression also found evidence consistent with cognitive change mediating the relationship between Socratic questioning and symptom improvement.

The wider lesson extends well beyond therapy:

Better questions often produce better thinking.

Seven Meta Model-style questions for everyday life

When you notice particularly rigid or negative self-talk, try asking:

1. What specifically do I mean?
2. Who specifically?
3. Always?
4. Never?
5. How do I know that?
6. What is stopping me?
7. What would happen if I could?

Suppose you find yourself thinking:

“I’m terrible at public speaking.”

Ask:

“Terrible compared with whom?”

“Every time?”

“Which aspect specifically?”

Perhaps the real answer is:

“I become nervous during the first two minutes when speaking to a large audience.”

Now we have something trainable.

Precision creates possibility.

7. Logical Levels

Creating greater alignment between what you do and who you want to become

This is actually one of  – if not my favourite NLP model.  We can achieve goals that do not actually make us happier.

We can become highly efficient at living a life that does not particularly matter to us.

That is why personal development needs to include more than performance.

It also requires alignment.

One well-known NLP framework associated particularly with Robert Dilts is commonly called Logical Levels or Neurological Levels.

Different versions exist, but a commonly used structure includes:

Environment

Where and when?

Behaviour

What am I doing?

Capabilities

How am I doing it?

Beliefs and Values

Why is this important?

Identity

Who am I becoming?

Purpose or Larger System

What does this contribute to beyond myself?

Dilts has used versions of this framework within his work on change, leadership and personal alignment.

As with several NLP frameworks, Logical Levels is best regarded as a reflective model rather than a scientifically established hierarchy of the human mind.

Its practical usefulness lies in the questions it encourages us to ask.

Why alignment matters for wellbeing

Imagine somebody pursuing promotion after promotion.

At the behavioural level they are successful.

At the values level, however, they desperately want more time with their family.

Eventually the conflict between achievement and values may create dissatisfaction.

Research outside NLP provides particularly relevant insights here.

Sheldon and Elliot’s self-concordance model found that people tend to show greater persistence towards goals that are consistent with their personal interests and core values, and that achieving such self-concordant goals can provide greater wellbeing benefits.

Further work by Sheldon and Houser-Marko suggested that pursuing and achieving self-concordant goals may contribute to an upward process of improved adjustment and wellbeing.

Self-Determination Theory similarly emphasises the importance of autonomy, competence and relatedness to healthy motivation and wellbeing (Ryan & Deci, 2000).

So when setting a goal, do not ask only:

“Can I achieve it?”

Also ask:

“Why does achieving this matter to me?”

A Logical Levels personal alignment exercise

Choose an important area of your life.

Perhaps:

• career;
• relationships;
• health;
• learning;
• finances;
• family;
• personal development.

Then work through these questions.

Environment

Where am I currently spending my time?

Does my environment support the life I want?

Behaviour

What am I repeatedly doing?

Which behaviours are helping?

Which are getting in the way?

Capabilities

What do I need to become better at?

What skills would make the biggest difference?

Beliefs and Values

What do I believe about this area of my life?

What is genuinely important to me?

Am I pursuing this because I want it, or because I think I should want it?

Identity

Who do I want to be in this area of my life?

What kind of colleague, parent, leader, friend or partner do I want to become?

Purpose

What larger contribution does this make?

Who else benefits if I become better at this?

These questions often reveal something that simple goal-setting misses.

Sometimes the problem is not that somebody lacks motivation.

The problem is that the goal is disconnected from what genuinely matters to them.

Bringing the Seven Tools Together

The real value of NLP does not necessarily come from using one technique in isolation.

It comes from developing a habit of greater awareness and flexibility.

Imagine somebody facing an important career decision.

They could use the seven tools together.

Well-Formed Outcomes

What do I actually want?

Reframing

What other ways could I interpret my current situation?

State Management

What emotional state will help me think clearly about this?

Mental Imagery

What future am I repeatedly imagining, and is that helping me?

Perceptual Positions

How might the situation look from another person’s perspective or from a neutral viewpoint?

Meta Model

Which assumptions am I treating as facts?

Logical Levels

Is this decision consistent with the person I want to become and what matters to me?

Notice what is happening.

Instead of automatically reacting, the individual is thinking about their thinking.

That capacity for reflection is one of the foundations of personal development.

A Ten-Minute NLP Routine for Everyday Wellbeing

You do not need to spend hours every day practising NLP.

A simple ten-minute reflective routine can incorporate many of these principles.

Minute 1–2: Check your state

Ask:

How am I feeling?

Do not judge the answer.

Simply notice it.

Minute 3: Choose your desired state

Ask:

What state would help me today?

Calm?

Curiosity?

Confidence?

Patience?

Determination?

Minute 4–5: Identify your outcome

Ask:

What is one meaningful thing I would like to move forward today?

Make it specific.

Minute 6: Future pace

Imagine completing the important action successfully.

What will you see?

What will you hear?

How will you feel?

Minute 7: Challenge an assumption

Notice one unhelpful thought.

Ask:

How do I know this is true?

Minute 8: Reframe

Ask:

What else could this mean?

Minute 9: Take another perspective

Ask:

How might somebody else see this?

Minute 10: Choose action

Ask:

What is the smallest useful action I can take next?

Then do it.

The objective is not perfect thinking.

The objective is greater choice.

NLP and the Development of Personal Resilience

Resilience is sometimes misunderstood as the ability to remain permanently positive.

It is not.

Resilience involves adapting to difficulty, recovering after setbacks and maintaining or rebuilding effective functioning when circumstances become challenging.

Several of the tools discussed within this article can contribute to that process.

Reframing can help prevent one setback becoming a global judgement about life.

The Meta Model can challenge catastrophic language.

Perceptual Positions can create psychological distance.

State management can help somebody access previously successful ways of responding.

Well-formed outcomes can redirect attention towards the future.

Mental imagery can be used to rehearse effective responses.

Logical Levels can reconnect difficult short-term experiences with longer-term values and purpose.

The common theme is psychological flexibility.

Rather than:

“This happened, therefore I must feel and behave this way.”

we begin asking:

“This happened. What are my options now?”

That question can be extraordinarily powerful.

NLP and Better Relationships

Our quality of life is strongly influenced by the quality of our relationships.

And communication is central to relationships.

NLP places considerable emphasis on observing both verbal and non-verbal communication, listening carefully and attempting to understand another person’s model of the world.

This should not be confused with simplistic claims that we can “read minds” from body language.

Human communication is considerably more complex.

What we can do, however, is become more curious.

Instead of assuming we know what somebody means, ask.

Instead of preparing our response while somebody else is speaking, listen.

Instead of immediately defending our position, explore theirs.

Modern research increasingly emphasises the importance of high-quality listening and perceived responsiveness for interpersonal connection.

Research involving couples discussing stressful experiences has also found attentive listening to be associated with better dyadic coping and greater relationship satisfaction.

This provides a useful everyday NLP principle:

The meaning of communication is not simply what we intended to say. What matters is also how the communication is received.

If somebody repeatedly misunderstands us, simply repeating ourselves more loudly may not be the most intelligent strategy.

Flexibility means changing how we communicate.

NLP Is Ultimately About Developing Choice

Perhaps one of the most useful ways of thinking about personal development is through the idea of increasing choices.

Without awareness, we tend to react habitually.

Something happens.

We become angry.

Somebody criticises us.

We become defensive.

Something goes wrong.

We catastrophise.

We remember failure.

We avoid trying again.

We become anxious.

We imagine disaster.

The pattern feels automatic.

Personal development creates a small but enormously important space between stimulus and response.

Inside that space we can begin asking:

What am I thinking?

What am I assuming?

What state am I in?

What state would be more useful?

What else could this mean?

What do I actually want?

What can I learn?

What might the other person be experiencing?

What is within my control?

What could I do next?

This does not make us immune from difficulty.

It makes us more resourceful in responding to it.

Seven NLP Questions Worth Asking Every Day

If remembering all seven models feels excessive, remember these seven questions instead:

1. What do I want?

Outcome thinking.

2. What else could this mean?

Reframing.

3. What state would help me most right now?

State management.

4. What am I repeatedly imagining?

Mental imagery.

5. How might this look from another perspective?

Perceptual Positions.

6. How do I know that what I am telling myself is true?

Meta Model.

7. Is what I am doing consistent with what genuinely matters to me?

Logical Levels and alignment.

Used regularly, these questions can change the quality of our internal conversations.

And internal conversations influence external behaviour.

Final Thoughts: Small Changes Can Create Significant Differences

Improving quality of life does not always require a dramatic transformation.

Sometimes it begins with noticing one thought.

Changing one interpretation.

Asking one better question.

Imagining one possibility differently.

Entering one conversation in a calmer state.

Looking at one disagreement through another person’s eyes.

Setting one meaningful outcome.

Taking one small action.

NLP provides a practical collection of models for exploring these processes.

What happens when I change the way I think about this?

What happens when I ask a different question?

What happens when I deliberately change my state?

What happens when I look at the situation from another perspective?

What happens when I become clearer about what I really want?

Personal development begins with awareness.

Awareness creates choices.

Choices create different actions.

And over time, different actions can create a very different experience of life.

Key links:

Free email Course – Discover the Power of NLP in Just 7 Days

Free Video Course – Why Study NLP? Discover the Benefits of NLP Training

References

Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1975). The Structure of Magic: A Book About Language and Therapy, Vol. 1. Science and Behavior Books.

Bouton, M. E., & Moody, E. W. (2004). Memory processes in classical conditioning. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(7), 663–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.09.001

Cahill, V. A., Malouff, J. M., Little, C. W., & Schutte, N. S. (2020). Trait perspective taking and romantic relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(8), 1025–1035. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000661

Dilts, R. (1990). Changing Belief Systems with NLP. Meta Publications.

Dilts, R. (1996). Visionary Leadership Skills: Creating a World to Which People Want to Belong. Meta Publications.

Dilts, R. (1999). Sleight of Mouth: The Magic of Conversational Belief Change. Meta Publications.

Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1

Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281–291.

Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348

Holmes, E. A., & Mathews, A. (2010). Mental imagery in emotion and emotional disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(3), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.001

Itzchakov, G., & Reis, H. T. (2023). Listening and perceived responsiveness: Unveiling the significance and exploring crucial research endeavors. Current Opinion in Psychology, 53, 101662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101662

Kross, E., & Ayduk, O. (2017). Self-distancing: Theory, research, and current directions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 81–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.002

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705

Morton, C., & MacLeod, A. K. (2023). Vividness of imagery and affective response to episodic memories and episodic future thoughts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Memory, 31(8), 1098–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2224609

O’Connor, J., & Seymour, J. (2011). Introducing NLP: Psychological Skills for Understanding and Influencing People. Conari Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.482

Sheldon, K. M., & Houser-Marko, L. (2001). Self-concordance, goal attainment, and the pursuit of happiness: Can there be an upward spiral? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 152–165.

Vittorio, L. N., Murphy, S. T., Braun, J. D., & Strunk, D. R. (2022). Using Socratic questioning to promote cognitive change and achieve depressive symptom reduction: Evidence of cognitive change as a mediator. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 150, 104035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2022.104035